Saturday, March 10, 2012

Price Anchoring, Or Why a $499 iPad Seems Inexpensive

photo: buckaroobay

When Steve Jobs introduced the iPad, he showed off its high-resolution screen, touted its revolutionary features, and said things like �boom!� and �wow!� a lot. But that wasn�t what made the crowd go wild.

�What should we price it at?� asked Jobs. �If you listen to the pundits, we�re going to price it at under $1000, which is code for $999.� He put a giant �$999� up on the screen and left it there for ages before finally going on. �I am thrilled to announce to you that the iPad pricing starts not at $999,� said Jobs, �but at just $499.� On-screen, the $999 price was crushed by a falling �$499.�

Showmanship? Sure. But this stuff works. It�s called the anchoring effect, and it�s been well understood by psychologists for decades. Marketers use it against you all the time�but sometimes you can turn the tables, and I�ll tell you how.

�Any time you have to estimate a numerical value, it turns out you�re very susceptible to the power of suggestion,� says William Poundstone, author of the new book Priceless: The Myth of Fair Value (and How to Take Advantage of It). �Any related value that you hear just before you make your estimate really does have this big statistical impact on what number you�re going to estimate.�

In other words, at the moment Jobs says, �The pundits think we�re going to price it at under $1000,� this plants a seed in your mind: an iPad costs something like $1000. When he reveals the real price, you feel like you�ve just saved $500. If he said, �We were thinking of pricing it at $399, but we decided to go for $499,� that would feel like a ripoff�even though absolutely nothing has changed.

You�ve been MSRPed off

Retailers understand this effect very well. It�s why Manufacturer Suggested Retail Prices exist. You run into these all the time, especially in online shopping. Recently I went shopping for a pair of speakers, and I was pleased to note that they were marked down $60 from the MSRP.

Of course! , the MS RP is a completely made-up number, like Jobs�s $999. No one has ever paid MSRP for the speakers. I knew this, but it looked like a good deal anyway.

In fact, studies have shown that “people who are more reflective, are, if anything, even more susceptible to anchoring,� says Poundstone. Phew! �So it�s definitely not just stupid people. This is really about the way the human mind works, and specifically about the way we pull a number out of the air, which we often have to do in a society that�s kind of obsessed with numbers and money.�

Surely, though, if you know about anchoring and how it works, you�ll be relatively immune. Right? Hardly. In one study, the psychologists explained exactly what they were testing and told the subjects to be on guard against it. �When you answer the questions on the following pages,� they wrote, �please be careful not to have this contamination effect happen to you.” The warning didn�t work.

Oh, and I bought the speakers.

Anchoring everywhere

Once you know about the anchoring effect, you see it all over the place. At the supermarket, why do they print a double price label showing the sale price and the regular price? Anchoring. It�s not a deal unless you can compare with the old price. (And if you think you can remember the old price, you�re wrong: shoppers are very bad at remembering what price they typically pay, even for their favorite items.)

How about those menus where you can choose between the small and large plates of pasta? The high price of the large plate makes the small one look like a bargain�even though the small plate is probably more profitable for the restaurant and is the one they expected you to order all along. You know the restaurant with the $150 hamburger? What kind of idiot would order that! I�m going to stick with the rack of lamb for only $45.

Making it work for you

I�d like to give you some tricks for beating the anchoring effect, though don’t get your hopes up too much: as long a! s that�s a human brain you�re carrying around in your skull, that you’ll never succumb to it is pretty hopeless.

Sometimes, however, you get to help set the price. And that�s when, if you can be quick and bold, the research is on your side.

That makes intuitive sense. But it�s wrong. The title of a famous paper sums it up: �The more you ask for, the more you get.� There is zero evidence for a rebound effect. Lawyers who ask for absurd, billion-dollar awards don�t get what they ask for�but they get more than if they�d asked for mere millions. Once that huge number gets into a juror�s head, anchoring takes over.

That�s bad news if someone breaks their leg in your driveway. But if you�re bargaining for a new car or negotiating a salary, says Poundstone, �it�s really a good idea to get your number in first in a negotiation rather than letting the other guy name a number first.�

If you’re selling something, ask for much more than you think you�re going to get. If you�re buying — especially if it’s a big purchase like a car or a house –�bring a friend. �Have someone there with you who will take your side and will say, �Think of reasons why what you�re saying is right and what they�re saying is a ripoff,�� says Poundstone. �It really does have a measurable statistical effect.�

Now, if you�ll excuse me, I need to go shopping. I�m out of cereal, and�what? Cap�n Crunch is $2 off? Better make it two boxes.

Matthew�Amster-Burton, author of the book Hungry Monkey, writes on food�and finance from his home in Seattle.

Mint.com the best FREE way to manage your money. Get started here!

Best Wall St. Stocks Today: AIG,CSCO,STT,GOOG,TWX,BBY,WMT,VOD,BBI,GM,YHOO,GS,BCS,SNE

According to Reuters, a price battle among goods makers is beginning.

Reuters reports that payments to AIG (AIG) employees is causing rage among people already concerned about the bailout.

Reuters reports that Bernanke sees a US recovery starting in 2010.

Reuters writes that the Feds want to freeze Ruth Madoff’s assets.

Reuters writes that Obama will announce measures to help small businesses.

Reuters reports that the newspaper crisis is sparking a debate about free online news.

Reuters writes that the Treasury is close to proposing new bank rules.

Reuters reports that the Virgin megastores in the US are closing.

The Wall Street Journal writes that the US will set tougher capital standards for banks and create�greater authority to take over financial firms.

The Wall Street Journal reports that Cisco (CSCO) is starting an era were large tech companies compete more activity and cooperate less.

The Wall Street Journal reports that pension expenses will rise at many state and municipal funds.

The Wall Street Journal reports that stock offerings are being done in a more rapid fashion.

The Wall Street Journal writes that the pay of the CEO of State Street (STT) rose as the stock fell.

The Wall Street Journal reports that OPEC will hold oil output steady.

The Wall Street Journal reports that the G20 are pressing the US to repair its banks.

The Wall Street Journal reports that the value of the dollar and gold are now inseparable.

The Wall Street Journal reports that Google (GOOG) was dealt a blow when its advertising chief left for AOL (TWX).

The Wall Street Journal reports that Best Buy (BBY) is up against a powerful rival in Wal-Mart (WMT).

The Wall Street Journal reports that Congress is advancing legislation to help unions on government contracts.

The Wall Street Journal reports that dividend cuts are starting to hurt investors.

The Wall Street Journal ! reports that Vodafone (VOD) plans to raise money on the value of its assets in Qatar.

The Wall Street Journal reports that revenue to the UK government is being hit by the falling price of oil.

The Wall Street Journal reports that more directors are cutting their own pay.

The Wall Street Journal report that Blockbuster (BBI) results will shed light it debt.

The Wall Street Journal report that federal officials are looking through the GM (GM) operating plan to make a decision about the company;s future.

The Wall Street Journal reports that PC makes and chip companies are moving into the handheld business.

The Wall Street Journal writes that Yahoo! (YHOO) will launch niche video products.

The FT reports that China lost $80 billion in its move to diversify its assets.

The FT reports that US earnings had their first quarterly loss since 1935.

The FT reports that Goldman Sachs (GS) held talks to buy Wachovia.

Bloomberg reports that Barclays (BCS) said it had a strong start to the year.

Bloomberg reports that Sony (SNE) is being pressed to cut the prices of its PS3.

Douglas A. McIntyre

Fabrinet Goes Red

Fabrinet (NYSE: FN  ) reported earnings Feb. 6. Here are the numbers you need to know.

The 10-second takeaway
For the quarter ended Dec. 30 (Q2), Fabrinet beat expectations on revenues and beat expectations on earnings per share.

Compared to the prior-year quarter, revenue increased and GAAP earnings per share dropped to a loss.

Margins shrank across the board.

Revenue details
Fabrinet reported revenue of $186.3 million. The three analysts polled by S&P Capital IQ expected to see revenue of $177.5 million. Sales were 48% lower than the prior-year quarter's $173.7 million.

anImage

Source: S&P Capital IQ. Quarterly periods. Dollar amounts in millions.

EPS details
Non-GAAP EPS came in at $0.45. The four earnings estimates compiled by S&P Capital IQ averaged $0.42 per share on the same basis. GAAP EPS were -$0.96 for Q1 against $0.46 per share for the prior-year quarter.

anImage

Source: S&P Capital IQ. Quarterly periods. Figures may be non-GAAP to maintain comparability with estimates.

Margin details
For the quarter, gross margin was 9.2%, 360 basis points worse than the prior-year quarter. Operating margin was -37.9%, 4,750 basis points worse than the prior-year quarter. Net margin was -34.4%, 4,300 basis points worse than the prior-year quarter.

Looking ahead
Next quarter's average estimate for revenue is $76.7 million. On the bottom line, the average EPS estimate is -$0.42.

Next year's average estimate for revenue is $557.6 million. The average EPS estimate is $0.33.

Investor sentiment
!
The stock has a two-star rating (out of five) at Motley Fool CAPS, with 23 members rating the stock outperform and three members rating it underperform. Among seven CAPS All-Star picks (recommendations by the highest-ranked CAPS members), four give Fabrinet a green thumbs-up, and three give it a red thumbs-down.

Of Wall Street recommendations tracked by S&P Capital IQ, the average opinion on Fabrinet is hold, with an average price target of $18.38.

Over the decades, small-cap stocks, like Fabrinet, have provided market-beating returns, provided they're value priced and have solid businesses. Read about a pair of companies with a lock on their markets in "Too Small to Fail: Two Small Caps the Government Won't Let Go Broke." Click here for instant access to this free report.

  • Add Fabrinet to My Watchlist.

Friday, March 9, 2012

Best China Stocks 2012 - ATML, LTXC Advance to the Head of the Small Cap Semiconductor Class

Semiconductor stocks Atmel Corp. Best China Stocks 2012 - (ATML) and LTX-Credence Corp. (LTXC) were up firmly yesterday, even though the rest of the semiconductor industry didn't follow their lead. The same goes for the week so far - these two stocks are up, but the group as a whole has been flat. Nevertheless, and perhaps despite, the semi industry's two best today may also be the two best stock prospects going forward,

Best China Stocks 2012 - Atmel Corp. (ATML) was up 2.2% following Tuesday's announcement that the company was debuting its first in a series of 400 Mhz ARM926-embedded MPUs. However, since about three people in the whole world know what that means (and even fewer investors), it's difficult to attribute the gain to the news. That's a good thing though, as it means ATML shares are pointed higher under their own power.

Though profits have been hit and miss of late, note that the company swing to a profit during Q1 of this year... a time when earnings were elusive at best. If analysts have underestimated the EPS this time around with the forecast of a 5 cent loss for the quarter, Atmel shares could get even more traction.

Technically speaking, the stock is getting positioned to pop out of a very long-term wedge shape.

Best China Stocks 2012 - LTX-Credence Corp.
(LTXC) ended the day higher by 9.2% on no news whatsoever. The last word form the company came in mid-July following the development of a couple of big sales opportunities stemming from Maxim Integrated Products and Blood Stem Cell Storage Company. There was no certainty or time frame associated with the news though.

Most likely, LTXC shares took a cue from Kulicke and Best China Stocks 2012 - Soffa (KLIC) following the company's anno! uncement of Q3's results and Q4's estimates. In a nutshell, Kulicke's third quarter was a disaster, but the company is looking for revenue to come in at mre than twice what analysts originally expected.

Though Kulicke's outlook may be excessively optimistic, LTXC's chart suggests investors were already expecting a parallel improvement in semiconductor sales from LTX-Credence. The slow U-shaped reversal has continued on with growing volume... which is frequently the missing piece for many failed chart recoveries.

As for an outlook regarding all the small cap semiconductor stocks, the S&P 600 Semiconductor Index as well as the S&P 600 Semi Equipment Index both look more than a little overbought. As such, a bullish industry/market-cap bias is discouraged.


However, both Atmel (semiconductor manufacturer) and LTX-Credence (semiconductor equipment and materials) have lagged their respective indices, and only recently have they started to move. These two stocks could indeed be worthy purchases at these prices.

Thursday, March 8, 2012

Best Companies to invest - Raymond James Hires 2 UBS Advisors in S.C.

Raymond James Financial said Tuesday that it had recruited two financial advisors with a combined $125 million in assets and $850,000 in yearly sales.
The two new Raymond James & Associates advisors are Best Companies to invest - Carolyn Edwards, CFP, and Roy Seay in Mount Pleasant, S.C.
“I am pleased to welcome Carolyn and Roy to the Raymond James family,” said Scott Curtis, senior vice president of the private client group of RJA, the employee broker-dealer of Raymond James, in a press release. “Our advisor-centric culture and broad platform continues to attract some of the very best advisors in the industry, and we’re proud to be affiliated with them.”
Edwards and Seay join the firm from UBS and will operate as the Seay/Edwards Group of Raymond James in Mount Pleasant, S.C., which is near Charleston.
Edwards spent 11 years as a vice president of investments with Best Companies to invest - UBS, while Seay served as a divisional vice president of UBS for the same amount of time. Before joining UBS, Seay – who has worked in the industry for more than four decades – was a partner and branch manager with J.C. Bradford & Co., for 15 years.
The two advisors provide financial, estate and retirement planning, and the team specializes in bonds, particularly South Carolina municipals.

“Changing firms can be very disruptive to your business, so we knew this was a once in a lifetime move, and we better get it right. There is no question that we got it right!”
said Edwards, in a statement. “Every day Raymond James proves that the client is at the top of the pyramid. It is very refreshing.”
“When we realized that [Raymond James Executive Chairman] Tom James and [Raymond James & Associates President] Dennis Zank personally knew Jimmy Bradford, who had been a mentor to me and many others, that connection had a big impact on us, and we knew we had found a home,” Seay explained in a press release.
Through its three primary broker-dealer subsidiaries, Raymond James Financial has more than 5,300 financial advisors in the United States, Canada and overseas – of which close to 1,300 are U.S.-based RJA advisors.
Total client assets are about $266 billion, of which approximately $34 billion are managed by the firm’s asset-management subsidiaries.
Earlier in the week, as it kicked off the Raymond James 32nd Annual Institutional Investors Conference from March 6-9, the firm said it had been selected as a Greenwich Associates Quality Leader in two categories for 2010.
For the second time in three years, Raymond James says, it earned top marks among clients in U.S. Equity Research and Analyst Service Quality–Small and Mid-Cap Funds, and U.S. Equity Sales Quality–Small and Mid-Cap Funds. The firm was recognized in the same categories in 2008.
The awards are based on a 2010 survey that involves 40,000 large corporate and institutional users of financial services and products, according to Best Companies to invest - Greenwich.

Best Stocks To Buy Now